User talk:C12H22O11
Old messages on this talk page are archived at my talk archives:
- archive 01 (18 Apr 2005 - 17 Aug 2005)
- archive 02 (18 Aug 2005 - 04 Sep 2005)
- archive 03 (04 Sep 2005 - 20 Sep 2005)
- archive 04 (10 Oct 2005 - 07 Nov 2005)
- archive 05 (08 Nov 2005 - 24 Dec 2005)
- archive 06 (25 Dec 2005 - 13 Jan 2006)
- archive 07 (14 Jan 2006 - 28 Feb 2006)
- archive 08 (01 Mar 2006 - 22 May 2006)
- archive 09 (25 May 2006 - 06 Jul 2006)
- archive 10 (22 Jul 2006 - 28 Aug 2006)
Spam
[edit]Why did you write me to say I was spamming? I was simply trying to add an article about Faith Christian Reformed Church of Elmhurst. Please explain. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gregschuringa (talk • contribs) 21:23, 28 August 2006 (UTC).
(comments left by Swadhyayee (talk · contribs) cut due to enormity)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks and apologies Swadhyayee 14:42, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
September Esperanza Newsletter
[edit]
|
|
|
Could you tell me?
[edit]Do you have idea that the time mentioned in history of an article is what time? Is it U.S. time?
Swadhyayee 17:48, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
November Esperanza Newsletter
[edit]
|
|
|
Image:Suvi-Anne Siimes.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Suvi-Anne Siimes.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
- On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 06:00, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Untagged image
[edit]An image you uploaded, Image:Naantali coat of arms.gif, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 16:25, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Nottingham Trent University tram
[edit]Thanks for moving Nottingham Trent University tram station to Nottingham Trent university tram stop. Unfortunately, the latter page does not actually exist, so the result was the effective deletion of the article. I would be grateful if you could rectify the situation. Best regards, FrFintonStack 00:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Album cover, 'Du rire aux larmes'.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Album cover, 'Du rire aux larmes'.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:18, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Album cover, 'Gravé dans la roche'.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Album cover, 'Gravé dans la roche'.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:18, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
List of railway lines in Finland
[edit]fi:Riihimäen rautatieasema (which I translated as Riihimäki railway station) says that only local and cargo trains travel between Riihimäki and Lahti. However, every long-distance route listed at List of railway lines in Finland (even those to Russia) going via Lahti also goes via Riihimäki. Is the information on the Wikipedia article obsolete? JIP | Talk 07:24, 25 February 2007 (UTC) JIP | Talk 07:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Deletion of page for "David Dill", 25 December 2005
[edit]Apparently, the reason I don't have a Wikipedia page is that you deleted it. Why was that? The log doesn't seem to have any explanation (forgive me if I failed to find it -- this is the first time I've tried to research a deletion). DavidLDill (talk) 22:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Deletion Review for David Dill
[edit]An editor has asked for a deletion review of David Dill. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. DavidLDill (talk) 20:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Deletion of the "Hypnogaja" page.
[edit]I dont see any reason for the band page to be taken away.
This deleting inactive stuff, will make this site into a pop-pedia in a few years. Stupid, stupid. ---- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.203.49.134 (talk) 22:17, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Leopold Wolfsohn
[edit]I hate it how you guys deleted him. Aaron Copland was his student, and I was doing research on him. Now I can't because he is gone. I looked at why you deleted him and it read that the content was: poopy What's that supposed to mean?
- 71.162.177.207 (talk) 13:33, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
>?> —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.177.207 (talk) 13:34, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]Hello C12H22O11! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 199 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Keith Armstrong - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Jeffrey Beard - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Shurik'n - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Olavi Mäenpää - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Kuntainfo
[edit]Template:Kuntainfo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:26, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity
[edit]Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 20:11, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Template:Metro station head has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Secondarywaltz (talk) 19:27, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Template:Metro station has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Secondarywaltz (talk) 19:27, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Template:Metro station2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Secondarywaltz (talk) 19:27, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
File:Naantali coat of arms.gif listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Naantali coat of arms.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:30, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Notice of change
[edit]Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 9
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Finnish Cup, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ESC, EBK and KPS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Finnish Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tammela (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Finnish Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Funchal.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Funchal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:52, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Jeteur de pierres
[edit]The article Jeteur de pierres has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 12:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Turku coat of arms.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Turku coat of arms.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 23:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Category:VR commuter rail has been nominated for discussion
[edit]Category:VR commuter rail, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:24, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
"PK-35" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]A discussion is taking place to address the redirect PK-35. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 29#PK-35 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 06:54, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
The article List of postal codes in Finland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:NOTDIRECTORY: consensus to delete "just a list of postal codes" articles demonstrated in previous AfDs ([1], [2]). The non-list content of this article is already covered at Postal codes in Finland.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. asilvering (talk) 06:42, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of George Walker (educator) for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Walker (educator) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.